Archive for satan

All Paths Lead Somewhere

Posted in Devil, religion, Uncategorized with tags , , on December 10, 2010 by devilbloggger

Human sacrifices please me.  (Well, most human sacrifices.)

Did you know that? I love human sacrifices, whether by slow death over a long lifetime of being deceived by me, or a fast death offered up on a hot fire by people deceived by me, I find the smell of burning flesh particularly pleasing.  And many religions of the world agree with me.  Do you respect me for that?

You would if you were fooled into believing that mere ”tolerance” for all religious beliefs should be replaced by “mutual respect.” 

Ha ha ha ha ha. 

I’ve mentioned before how fond I am of the Huffington Post’s Religion section. It showcases the epitome of post-modern, relativistic religiosity, and archives a veritable treasure trove of my thinking.  And today, a piece by Rajiv Malhotra entitled, “Tolerance Isn’t Good Enough: The Need for Mutual Respect in Interfaith Relations,” made it onto the “Hot News” section of my bulletin board.  In fact, I think I’ll bestow a coveted devilbloggger Fire Bug Award onto ol’ Raj, my friend.

Raj imagines a dinner table metaphor and asks if being tolerated at the table despite your beliefs is not only patronizing, but downright insulting.  He suggests we scrap tolerance as an insufficient grace toward those we believe to be wrong, and replace it with mutual respect:

“In religious circles, tolerance, at best, is what the pious extend toward people they regard as heathens, idol worshippers or infidels. It is time we did away with tolerance and replaced it with “mutual respect.”

Tolerance has served me well for years, but hey, if you want to respect all my heathens, idol worshippers, and infidels, I suppose I’m game.

Come to think of it, I will take some of that mutual respect.

Tell me Rajiv, if you are reading, would you give respect to an Aztec friend of mine who religiously throws virgins and chillens by the tens of thousands onto the flame to ensure a cosmic balance?

Hmmmm?

Would you have him at your dinner table and respect his beliefs?  Would you let your daughter date him?

Ha ha ha ha ha.

My servants, do you see what I’ve done?  No?  OK, I’ll tell you.

Please, this is extremely sensitive kingdom knowledge.  I tell you only because I know you will not betray my strategy for destroying civilization on the altar of tolerance and respect.  If anyone we cannot trust is around, please ask them to leave the room.  After you read this, delete it and clear your browser history.  This is very sensitive.

Rajiv is a person of his time.  He has been taken captive by the “your truth is OK, my truth is OK” lie that I started spreading around 1700AD, whoops, I mean CE.   This is the lie that “all paths lead to God,” and, as Raj says, “there should be genuine respect for differences” because he believes that, indeed, other religions are “equally valid paths to God.”

Of course, this is nonsense. Is Raj going to mutually respect my Satan worshipers?  They believe in human sacrifice

Where do you draw the line, Raj?  Of course, a line must be drawn, right?

Ha ha ha ha ha.

My servants, do not be confused, the real target of Raj’s grand philosophizing is Christians or as he gently softens, “the Abrahamic faiths.”  He makes the obvious explicit by drawing specific attention to Christianity: 

The idea of “mutual respect” poses a real challenge to Christianity, which insists that salvation is only possible by grace transmitted exclusively through Jesus.

Raj, to show his grand wisdom, quotes a Lutheran minister who is equally confused (by me):

I asked her if her work on the Inter-Religious Council was consistent and compatible with her preaching as a Lutheran minister, and she confidently replied that it was. I then asked: “Is it Lutheran doctrine merely to ‘tolerate’ other religions or also to respect them, and by respect I mean acknowledging them as legitimate religions and equally valid paths to God”? She replied that this was “an important question,” one that she had been “thinking about,” but that there are “no easy answers.”

Yes, Ms. Lutheran.  There is an easy answer.  I know it.  I fight against it all day every day.  I don’t remember coming across you in the fight, and for that I’m pleased.  You, and Raj, and everyone else in the world who sees “no easy answers” makes my job of confusion, deception, and intellectual captivity to the ways of the world all that much easier. 

Thank you.

You see, my servants, what Raj and Ms. Lutheran do not want to admit is that religions make very definite and important, but contradictory truth claims.  Christianity says Jesus is God.  All other religions deny that. 

Somebody is lying. 

And I know who it is. 

But they don’t.

And you, my servants, must not hide behind the “no easy answers” flufferoonery.  Be a man, Ms. Lutheran.  Be a man, Mr. Raj.  Go ahead and say it: Christianity makes exclusive truth claims about God, and either (a) I’m am ashamed of it (Ms.), or (b) I don’t like it (Mr.).

Christianity is the only threat to my kingdom.  Raj and Ms. Lutheran both need to learn that.   Raj, you need to stop the soft-sell and attack Christianity with vigor like I do, and stop hiding behind “we must have mutual respect in interfaith relations” BS. 

Unless you want to prove it.  Come worship with me and some religious friends tonight at midnight by the bon-fire, and bring your daughter.

Oh, but will you respect me in the morning?

Ha ha ha ha ha.

My favorite book

Posted in atheists, Darwin, evolution, secular humanism with tags , , , , , on October 1, 2010 by devilbloggger

Guess which book is NOT my favorite!

Ha ha ha ha ha.

Now, if I can be serious for moment.  Some of my best work shows up in the form of books on earth.  And I burst with pride when I think about a few that really set my will in high gear.  It’s really hard to choose, and soon I will put down my top ten, but for sure in the top ten, if not number one is Charles Darwin’s Origin of Species.

Surprised?  Don’t be.  You see, for ages most people had strong leanings toward belief in God, in large part because of the existence of life and its diversity.  After all, a coherent world view must be able to explain not only why we are here and where we are going, but where we came from.  The ancient Greeks, like Epicurus, did a fine job of laying a naturalistic, Godless foundation for naturalistic “creation,” but still, life defied all Godless explanations.

Then along comes Darwin, just at a time when the world was ripe for a good Godless creation story, and what does he do?  He writes a book that substantiates nothing–ha ha ha ha ha.  But he wrote something that sought to explain how all the various species on earth could have come from a first life form (which remains unexplained).  His brilliance was in semantics, coining “natural selection,” which is not unlike “accidental purpose.”   He gave no evidence for natural selection, provided no examples of natural selection doing anything interesting (except for fictional examples to serve as placeholders), and he could not explain how the contrary fossil evidence of sudden creation could fit his theory of gradual change.   He figured later evidence would fill in the gaps.

But guess what?  He (and I) succeeded brilliantly!  Now everyone thinks we have tons of evidence, many examples, and we’ve succeeded in getting academicians and politicians to force the lie that there is no such thing as contrary evidence.  And the gaps?   They are still there!   Ha ha ha ha ha.  And school children are told they share a great- great- great- great-grandpa with an ape! And (though they are not told) a worm! And sea weed!  All living species came from that same darn first organism!  Ha ha ha ha ha!  I love it.

Really, I’m beside myself with pride in my success.  Good ol’ Darwin.  What a servant.  And his followers?  Well, the purposeful followers remain my servants, especially those who say that there is no conflict between religion and evolution.  That is the biggest, best lie of all. I get giddy when I hear that one.

Of course, it depends on what religion you are talking about.  There are many religions for which evolution is not only compatible, it is a stated tenet.  Take Secular Humanism, for example, Darwinian evolution is in its creed.  And atheism?  Its believers must believe Darwinism as an article of faith. 

But if you are talking about a religion that believes like I do in a creative God who created out of nothing, well, there’s obviously no compatibility between it and mindless, purposeless processes of Darwinian evolution.  And the evidence is on my side here, folks.

Political musing: Alan Grayson

Posted in congress, Grayson, politics, Webster with tags , , on September 29, 2010 by devilbloggger

I usually don’t endorse politicians.  I find they are all too fickle.  One day they take a position that I like, and the next day they change.

But I must admit I’m taking a liking to this Grayson cat, running for office in the United States.  He pretty much stands for everything I do.  He recently ran an attack ad on his opponent Daniel Webster that was just my style.  I don’t like that Webster dude.  And I hated to see that he raised some dough just because Grayson lied a bit in his ad.

Anyone who votes for Grayson is doing my will.

Go in fear, my servants.

Atheists are oh so smart

Posted in agnostics, atheists with tags , , , , on September 29, 2010 by devilbloggger

I like atheists.  I don’t understand how they could be atheists, but I like them.  They are my faithful servants.

A lot of people assume that I am an atheist.  But think about it.  Why would I be an atheist?

And now I have more to love about atheists; it seems they are the smartest about religion.  And I love for people to be smart about religion.  I just hate for them to be smart about God.

Huffington Post is reporting in an article entitled “Religious Literacy: Americans Don’t Know Much About Religion” how the atheists were able to answer more questions about religion correctly.  Here’s the opening paragraph:

A new survey of Americans’ knowledge of religion found that atheists, agnostics, Jews and Mormons outperformed Protestants and Roman Catholics in answering questions about major religions, while many respondents could not correctly give the most basic tenets of their own faiths.

Good for those atheists and agnostics.  Religion gets in the way of truth for all but one belief system.  (Think about it–if two religions make contradictory truth claims, as they do, they can’t both be right.  The more people “know” about religion, the less likely they are to know truth.)  So if atheists and agnostics know a lot about “religion” they are not likely to know much about truth. 

But here’s what I wonder: do atheists know the basic tenets of their faith?  They believe by faith that everything in the universe came from nothing.  First there was nothing, and then, poof! there was something.

Ha ha ha ha ha.

I don’t believe what atheists believe.  I’m actually surprised anyone does, because it is a logical necessity that if ever there was nothing, there would still be nothing.  But there isn’t nothing.  So there must have been something eternal.

I’m glad atheists don’t think deeply.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 116 other followers

%d bloggers like this: